Amos Black v. United States

On September 16, 1957, Amos Black, appellant herein, was convicted of violations of a federal narcotics law, 21 U.S.C. § 174 , and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. On January 16, 1964, appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. The district court, in an order filed on January 21, 1964, denied appellant’s petition. From this order appellant appeals, invoking the jurisdiction of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 .

*160 Appellant’s petition for a writ of habe-as corpus follows in the wake of numerous previous attempts attacking his conviction of September 16, 1957. 1 The only ground raised in appellant’s petition that has not previously been considered and found to be without merit is that appellant was denied his right to counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution because he was not represented by counsel at the time of his arraignment and plea.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute and are as follows: The transcript of the proceedings taken at the arraignment has been reproduced in appellant’s petition. The transcript shows that appellant…

(concurring) :

I concur in Judge Hamlin’s opinion. I suppose it is our duty to hear the repeated appeals of Amos Black, thin as they are. I am wondering if we shall not have an appeal soon on a conviction on his questionable testimony about the validity of his signature. (See Judge Hamlin’s footnote 1.) That would be new subject matter.

348 F.2d 159 Amos BLACK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 19204. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 25, 1965, Rehearing Denied July 27, 1965. Amos Black, in pro. per. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., John K. Van de Kamp, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Crim. Sec., John A. Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. 1 On September 16, 1957, Amos Black, appellant herein, was convicted of violations of a federal narcotics law, 21 U.S.C. 174, and sentenced to thirty years imprisonment. On January 16, 1964, appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. The district court, in an order filed on January 21, 1964, denied appellant's petition. From this order appellant appeals, invoking the jurisdiction of this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253. 2 Appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus follows in the wake of numerous previous attempts attacking his conviction of September 16, 1957. 1 The only ground raised in appellant's petition that has not previously been…