State of CA v. Super. Ct.
Opinion
Opinion
discussion of particular potential remedies should not be understood to preclude the adjudication of these issues when they are appropriately raised. We also express no opinion on the question whether violations of subdivision (a) might give rise to remedies under provisions such as the Unfair Competition Law, Business and Professions Code sections 17200 et seq. There is no change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.
__________________________________________________________________ CHANEY, Acting P. J. JOHNSON, J. MILLER, J*.
* Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 2 Filed 6/27/14 (unmodified version)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. B252073 MICHAEL WILSON et al., (Los Angeles County Petitioners, Super. Ct. No. BC367873) v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY,
Respondent;
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO.,
Real Party in Interest.