People Ex Rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.

Good Law
174 Cal. Rptr. 3d 626·2014 Cal. LEXIS 5181·59 Cal. 4th 772·2014 WL 3702674·329 P.3d 180
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2014S194388California5,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

The narrow question presented is whether an action under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. (UCL)) that is based on a trucking company’s alleged violation of state labor and insurance laws is “related to a price, route, or service” ( 49 U.S.C. § 14501 (c)(1)) of the company and, therefore, preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 ( Pub.L. No. 103-305 (Aug. 23, 1994) 108 Stat. 1569 ) (FAAAA). The FAAAA provides that a state “may not enact or enforce a law, regulation, or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route, or service of any motor carrier . : . with respect to the transportation of property.” ( 49 U.S.C. § 14501 (c)(1).) The People, on behalf of the State of California, filed this action against defendants Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. (Pac Anchor), and Alfredo Barajas (Barajas) for misclassifying drivers as independent contractors and for other alleged violations of California’s labor and unemployment insurance laws. As we explain, we conclude that the FAAAA does not preempt the People’s UCL action against defendants. We therefore affirm the Court of Appeal’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.