United States v. James Berry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 201412-50380California264 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 28 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-50380 13-50403 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 8:07-cr-00127-DOC v.

JAMES FRANK BERRY, a.k.a. James MEMORANDUM* Berry, a.k.a. Jim Berry, a.k.a. Jim F. Berry, a.k.a. Jim Frank Berry, a.k.a. Thomas Joseph Moran, a.k.a. Alexander Randall,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 22, 2014**

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, James Frank Berry appeals from the district

court’s 2012 judgment revoking supervised release and imposing an 11-month

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sentence, and the 2013 judgment revoking supervised release and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.