People v. Sanders CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2014D064934California157 words

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Sanders possessed a usable amount of heroin for personal use.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436

(Wende). Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel

mentions as a possible, but not arguable, issue whether Sanders was sentenced in

accordance with the plea agreement.

We granted Sanders permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738 including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed

no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Sanders has been competently represented by

counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

2 HALLER, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

O'ROURKE, J.

AARON, J.

3