People v. Sanders CA4/1
Opinion
BACKGROUND
Sanders possessed a usable amount of heroin for personal use.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and
proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to
review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436
(Wende). Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel
mentions as a possible, but not arguable, issue whether Sanders was sentenced in
accordance with the plea agreement.
We granted Sanders permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not
responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders,
supra, 386 U.S. 738 including the possible issue listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed
no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Sanders has been competently represented by
counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
2 HALLER, Acting P. J.
WE CONCUR:
O'ROURKE, J.
AARON, J.
3