Marriage of Baysinger CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2014E058483California2,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/29/14 Marriage of Baysinger CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re the Marriage of BILLY and CHERYL

BAYSINGER.

BILLY BAYSINGER,

E058483

Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. SBFSS46424) v.

OPINION

CHERYL BAYSINGER,

Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Raymond L. Haight

III and James J. Hosking, Judges. Affirmed.

Edmund L. Montgomery for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

1 Appellant Cheryl Baysinger appeals after an order denying her request to modify

spousal support. Cheryl1 contends on appeal as follows: (1) The trial court erred by

finding that it lacked jurisdiction to modify the spousal support order, which was filed

prior to the termination date of the previous spousal support order, but was not heard until

after the prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.