People v. Arnott CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2014C074275California1,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Because defendant’s contentions relate solely to the issue of victim restitution in the unfiled matter that is the subject of his Harvey waiver, the facts of the three filed cases are not at issue and need not be set forth in this opinion.

People v. Harvey (1979) 25 Cal.3d 754. 3 We granted defendant’s motion to augment the record with the investigative report in the unfiled matter, No. 11-22248. 4 The minute order, the original abstract of judgment, and the amended abstract of judgment incorrectly attribute this restitution to filed case No. 13F495.

2 In the unfiled matter, defendant passed the following nonsufficient funds checks:

Number Payee Date Amount

102 Farmer’s Market 09/13/2011 97.

121 Farmer’s Market 09/19/2011 60.

140 Sunshine Market 09/26/2011 32.

150 Costco 10/05/2011 266.

133 Top’s Market 09/24/2011 48.

135 Top’s Market 09/25/2011 64.

Winco Foods …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.