Cain

Cain v. Akano CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2014B246203California1,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Filed 7/29/14 Cain v. Akano CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BOBBIE R. CAIN, B246203

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC464958) v.

GOLDEN AKANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

William F. Fahey, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Wilfred I. Aka and Wilfred I. Aka for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Judith A. Gordon and Judith A. Gordon for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

_______________________________________ In this case, the trial court found, after a non-jury trial that the plaintiff and

respondent, Bobbie R. Cain, had loaned the defendant and appellant, Golden Akano, the

sum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.