United States v. Irma Reyes-Solosa

Good Law
761 F.3d 972·2014 WL 3733598·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14734
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 201413-50404California2,387 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Irma Reyes-Solosa appeals her twelvemonth post-revocation sentence imposed consecutively to her six-month criminal sentence for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . The district court continued Reyes-Solosa’s revocation hearing for about three weeks until after she was sentenced in her criminal case. Reyes-Solosa contends that the district court’s continuance was in error because she requested and was denied immediate revocation sentencing. She also challenges the substantive reasonableness of her twelve-month post-revocation sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I

On May 8, 2013, border patrol agents found Reyes-Solosa near the Calexico West Port of Entry in California. After Reyes-Solosa said that she was a citizen of Mexico and did not have documentation allowing her to be in the United States, the agents arrested her. On June 6, 2013, Reyes-Solosa was charged with violating the terms of her supervised release by illegally reentering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

At Reyes-Solosa’s revocation hearing on July 24, 2013, the district court said that it would continue the hearing until after Reyes-Solosa…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.