Yushun Piao v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
584 F. App'x 377
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 201412-70588California483 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yushun Piao, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agen cy’s factual findings. Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 963 (9th Cir.2004). We review de novo claims of due process violations. Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance. Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Piao’s testimony and her supporting medical documentation regarding whether she received treatment in China due to complications related to an abortion, or whether she received treatment for the removal of a tumor. See Li, 378 F.3d. at 962 (adverse credibility determinations supported by specific, cogent reasons that go to the heart of the claim will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.