Venegas

Venegas v. The Pep Boys etc. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2014B249579California963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/30/14 Venegas v. The Pep Boys etc. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

LESLIE VENEGAS, B249579

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC496327) v.

THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK

OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John Shepard Wiley, Judge. Affirmed. ______ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, John S. Battenfeld, and Thomas M. Peterson for Defendant and Appellant. Capstone Law, Glenn A. Danas, and Ryan H. Wu for Plaintiff and Respondent. ______ Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California (Pep Boys) appeals from the superior court’s order denying Pep Boys’ motion to compel arbitration. The sole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.