People v. Fritz CA4/2

DISCUSSION

Defendant appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to

represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)

All further statutory references will be to the Penal Code, unless otherwise noted.

2 The abstract of judgment also reflects that defendant pled guilty to other charges on another date and was sentenced on those counts at the same time.

2 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of

the case and one potential arguable issue: whether the trial court abused its discretion in

denying defendant’s motion to strike or modify the court-ordered restitution. Counsel

has also requested this court to undertake a review of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which

he has not done.

Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

HOLLENHORST

Acting P. J.

We concur:

RICHLI

J.

MILLER

J.

3