In re David H. CA5

DISCUSSION

An appealed-from judgment or order is presumed correct. (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) It is up to an appellant to raise claims of reversible error or other defect and present argument and authority on each point made. If an appellant does not do so, the appeal may be dismissed. (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, 994.) As previously mentioned, mother claims that there was missed information and adds she was not notified by mail of court dates and was not served properly with any paperwork. She however fails to explain what she means by missing information or lack of proper notice. Further, regarding her claim that she was denied proper notice, she fails to cite any supporting evidence from the appellate record. As it is not this court’s obligation to search the appellate record to support her claims (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 994), we conclude mother has not made a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error does exist.

DISPOSITION

This appeal is dismissed.

3