People v. Stapleton CA4/2

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel has filed a brief

under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738 setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and

potential arguable issues, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire

record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but,

surprisingly, given the length of his January 16, 2014 motion and extended notice of

appeal, he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th

106, we have conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

All section references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RAMIREZ

P. J.

We concur:

RICHLI

J.

MILLER

J.

4