Mykal S. Ryan v. Timothy Hyden

Good Law
584 F. App'x 416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201413-55041California160 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mykal S. Ryan, Special Administrator for the Estate of John James Ryan, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process and equal protection violations in connection with the enforcement of a default judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a pre-filing order. In re Fillbach, 223 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this action because Ryan failed to comply with the vexatious litigant order entered against him, which required him to obtain court approval before filing an action involving these defendants and issues. See id.

We reject Ryan’s contentions of alleged judicial bias and prejudice.

We deny Ryan’s outstanding requests.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.