Krishna Reddy v. Webmedx, Inc.

MEMORANDUM

Krishna Reddy appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing her employment action alleging federal and state law for discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination on the basis of a vexatious litigant order issued against her in a prior action in 2003 (the “2003 Vexatious Litigant Order”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469-70 (9th Cir.1990) (jurisdiction exists to review a pre-filing order before any pleading is re jected under it because it is “a kind of injunction which affects the rights of litigants”). We review for an abuse of discretion, id. at 469 , and we affirm.

In a previous appeal, this court affirmed the district court’s imposition of the 2003 Vexatious Litigant Order against Reddy, requiring her to post a $5,000 bond and to obtain the district court’s permission before filing any future actions against any defendant in the Central District of California. See Reddy v. Stotler, No. 03-56283, 114 Fed.Appx. 905 (9th Cir. Dec.10, 2004). Because Reddy failed to post bond or to obtain the district court’s permission before filing this action in compliance with the 2003 Vexatious Litigant…