Dohr

Dohr v. Lintz CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2014G049660California1,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/31/14 Dohr v. Lintz CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

WILLIAM F. DOHR,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and G049660 Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00502087) v.

OPINION

SUSAN D. LINTZ,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Robert J. Moss, Judge. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Richard D. Williams and Lytton, Williams, Messina & Hankin for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. W. Ernest Mooney and Law Offices of Ernest Mooney for Plaintiff, Cross- defendant and Respondent. * * *

THE COURT:*

We dismiss this appeal by a client from a sanction award against the client’s lawyer alone. We follow an extensive body of case law dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.