Bechtold

Bechtold v. Gillespie CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 2014H037038California799 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Filed 7/30/14 Bechtold v. Gillespie CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RAYMOND BECHTOLD, H037038

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Super. Ct. No. 1-08-CV119735) Respondent,

v.

PAUL D. GILLESPIE,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant;

VIKING AUTOMATION TOOLS, LLC,

Cross-defendant and Respondent

This case involved the business relationships and dealings between plaintiff Raymond Bechtold (Bechtold) and defendants Paul D. Gillespie (Gillespie) and American Tech Manufacturing, Inc. (ATM), Dymatix, Inc. (Dymatix), SESA, Inc.1 (SESA), Fastspares, Inc. (Fastspares) and SESA Group, Inc. (SESA Group). At the time of trial, Gillespie was the sole director and shareholder of ATM, Dymatix, SESA, and SESA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.