People v. Emerson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 2014C075271California606 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/1/14 P. v. Emerson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C075271

v. (Super. Ct. No. CRF132186)

ERIC LAMAR EMERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Eric Lamar Emerson asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.

1 I In March 2013, defendant (a registered sex offender) told his parole officer, John Carbone, that he was moving to West Sacramento. Carbone told defendant he would need to register his new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.