Henry Wheeler Holley v. Erma E. Cheuvront

Good Law
351 F.2d 615·1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 196520177California434 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ely, J.

In a California state court, appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of manslaughter. Following imposition of a sentence of confinement, he sought to appeal from the judgment of conviction. His Notice of Appeal was not submitted within the time required by California rules; hence, the clerk rejected it. At the same time, appellant was informed as to how he might seek relief from his default.

Subsequently, appellant moved the state court to vacate the judgment. This motion to vacate was denied, and again, a Notice of Appeal was filed after the time limit of ten days had expired. See Cal. Ct.R. 31(a). On this occasion also, the state court clerk informed appellant as to state procedure for relief from the default of untimely notice.

Appellant, not choosing to proceed further in the California courts, filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the court below. As respondents, he named the clerk who refused to accept his second untimely Notice of Appeal and the warden of the state prison in which he is confined.

The District Court dismissed the petition insofar as it sought relief against the respondent clerk and denied it as to the respondent warden. The dispositions were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.