Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, Buena Vista Distribution Co., Inc., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation v. Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc., Syufy Enterprises, Inc., Rancho Drive-In Theatre, Inc., and Bell Drive-In Theatre, Inc., Blumenfeld Enterprises, Inc. v. Winchester Drive-In Theatre, Inc., Syufy Enterprises, Inc., Rancho Drive-In Theatre, Inc., and Bell Drive-In Theatre, Inc.

Good Law
351 F.2d 925·1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,592·1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4230
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 196519402California3,650 words

Opinion

Opinion

351 F.2d 925 TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORPORATION, Buena Vista Distribution Co., Inc., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Appellants, v. WINCHESTER DRIVE-IN THEATRE, INC., Syufy Enterprises, Inc., Rancho Drive-In Theatre, Inc., and Bell Drive-In Theatre, Inc., Appellees. BLUMENFELD ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant, v. WINCHESTER DRIVE-IN THEATRE, INC., Syufy Enterprises, Inc., Rancho Drive-In Theatre, Inc., and Bell Drive-In Theatre, Inc., Appellees. No. 19400. No. 19402. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 22, 1965. Noble K. Gregory, Allan N. Littman, William I. Edlund, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants 20th Century Fox Film Corp., and others. Robert D. Raven, Douglas C. White, Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Blumenfeld Enterprises, Inc. Joseph L. Alioto, G. Joseph Bertain, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before BARNES, BASTIAN and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge: 1 This appeal comes before us under cirtification of the district court that a controlling question of law is involved as to which there is a substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.