National Labor Relations Board v. Tonkin Corporation of California, Doing Business as Seven Up Company of Sacramento

Good Law
352 F.2d 509
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 4, 196619714_1California873 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mathes, J.

The National Labor Relations Board petitions to enforce its order of June 10, 1964, entered after hearing upon a complaint. alleging violation by respondent, Seven Up Company of Sacramento, of § 8(a) (1), (2) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. [ 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a) (1), (2) and (3).]

This order directs respondent to “Withdraw and withhold all recognition from Sacramento 7-Up Employees’ Union or any successor thereto as representative of its employees”; and to cease giving effect to the April 1, 1963, contract between respondent and that union, “unless or until Sacramento 7-Up Employees’ Union is certified as bargaining representative by the National Labor Relations Board”. The order also directs respondent to reinstate an -employee, one Barwise, and “make him whole for any loss of earnings by reason of the discrimination against him”.

The basic issues presented by the petition are: (1) whether the hearing record establishes that respondent refused on April 1, 1963, to allow employees to work until after a new collective-bargaining agreement between respondent and the union had been signed; (2) whether this alleged “lockout” constituted an unfair labor practice; and (3)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.