Keith A. Noe v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary

Good Law
353 F.2d 282·1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3891
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 196519498California97 words

Opinion

This is an appeal from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was convicted of first degree burglary, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal to the state supreme court (State v. Noe, 1963, 93 Ariz. 373 , 381 P.2d 99 ). He later sought habeas corpus in the state court, which was denied.

We have examined the transcript and the exhibits, and we conclude that the evidence supports the findings of fact, that the findings support the conclusions of law, and that the decision is correct.

Affirmed.