Richard Schultze v. David Chandler, Sr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201412-15186California2,561 words
Opinion
Opinion
THOMAS, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD K. SCHULTZE; LORENZO V. No. 12-15186
ZUNINO; ROBERT BECCHETTI;
RICHARD QUESTONI, D.C. No. Appellants, 3:11-cv-04940-
WHA
v.
DAVID N. CHANDLER, SR.; DAVID N. ORDER AND
CHANDLER, P.C., AMENDED
Appellees. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 4, 2013—San Francisco, California
Filed July 18, 2014 Amended August 1, 2014
Before: Stephen S. Trott, Sidney R. Thomas, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.
Order; Opinion by Judge Thomas SUMMARY*
Bankruptcy
The panel filed (1) an order amending its opinion filed July 18, 2014, and (2) an amended opinion affirming the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of a malpractice action against an attorney for an unsecured creditors’ committee.
The panel held that the bankruptcy court properly exercised jurisdiction over the legal malpractice action after its removal from state court because the action was a…