Alaska Steamship Company v. Federal Maritime Commission

Good Law
356 F.2d 59·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 196620351_1California1,799 words

Opinion

Opinion

356 F.2d 59 ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, a corporation, and Northern Commercial Company, a corporation, d/b/a Northern Commercial Co. River Lines, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. No. 20351. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Feb. 2, 1966. Edward G. Dobrin, Stanley B. Long, Arthur G. Grunke, Bogle, Gates, Dobrin, Wakefield & Long, Seattle, Wash., for petitioners. Donald F. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Irwin A. Seibel, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., M. C. Miskovsky, Sol., Walter H. Mayo, III, Atty., Federal Maritime Comm., Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before HAMLEY, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges. HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: 1 This is a second review proceeding in a case involving the seasonal rates of Alaska Steamship Company (Alaska Steam) and Northern Commercial Company as prescribed for future application by the Federal Maritime Commission. In our first decision, rendered on April 15, 1965, we reversed and remanded the cause to the Commission for further proceedings. Alaska Steamship Company v. Federal Maritime Commission, 9 Cir., 344 F.2d 810 . This second opinion has been prepared on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.