In Re Coldiron And Peeples Oil Company

Good Law
356 F.2d 266·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 196619697California1,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

356 F.2d 266 In re COLDIRON AND PEEPLES OIL COMPANY, a corporation. Maidie O. RIEDEL, Appellant, v. COLDIRON AND PEEPLES OIL COMPANY, a corporation, also known as Coldiron & Peeples Oil Co., Alleged Bankrupt and Appellee. No. 19697. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. January 14, 1966. Kurt W. Melchior, of Severson, Zang, Werson, Berke & Larson, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Rogers, Clark & Jordan, Webster V. Clark, Ricardo J. Hecht, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge: 1 The referee in bankruptcy dismissed an involuntary petition to have Coldiron and Peeples Oil Company, a corporation, adjudged a bankrupt. The reason, stated in his order, was that Maidie O. Riedel, the sole petitioning creditor, "was not qualified as a petitioning creditor under Section 59, subdivision b, of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. 95 b)." The district court affirmed without opinion and petitioner has appealed. 2 Section 59 b currently requires a sole petitioner to have a provable claim against the alleged bankrupt; the claim must not be contingent as to liability; and it must be in the amount of at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.