United States v. James H. Marshall and Thelma Marshall

Good Law
357 F.2d 294·17 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 596·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6958
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 196620110California1,180 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tavares, J.

In 1959 Plaintiffs-Appellees sold their sole proprietorship business to a corporation, 60% of whose stock was owned by them. The $110,513.22 sale price was to be paid by the corporation assuming a $9,944.36 account owing to appellees, by its assuming $25,568.86 in current liabilities of the proprietorship, and by its executing a promissory note to the ap-pellees for $75,000. During 1959 plaintiffs received payment of the $9,944.36 account plus $4,000 in payment on the $75,000 note, and, in the ordinary course of business, the corporation paid obligations totaling $25,568.86 for which ap-pellees had been personally liable.

Appellees reported the resulting $20,-287.39 long-term capital gain on an installment basis, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 453 . The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the installment basis for returning the gain, contending that ap-pellees received more that 30% of the selling price in 1959 by virtue of the corporation paying the $25,568.86 in current business obligations for which ap-pellees had been personally liable.

Title 26 U.S.C. § 453 provides in material part, “ * * * [i]ncome from * * * a casual sale or other casual disposition of personal property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.