Herbert C. Deesen v. The Professional Golfers' Association of America, an Unincorporated Association

Good Law
358 F.2d 165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 196619837California3,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

Herbert C. Deesen brought this action against The Professional Golfers’ Association of America (PGA) and a number of individuals to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief for alleged violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. Damages were claimed in the sum of $70,000, trebled to $210,000. Jurisdiction in the district court was asserted under sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act.

In his complaint, as modified by the pretrial orders, Deesen, who is a professional golfer, claimed that PGA and its members have combined and conspired to monopolize the business of tournament golf professionals in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act. He also claimed that, as evidenced by PGA’s rules and regulations governing the eligibility of entrants into PGA sponsored and cosponsored tournaments, defendants have combined and conspired to restrain, unreasonably, the business of tournament golf professionals, and to boycott plaintiff, in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act.

After a trial without a jury, judgment was entered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals. In the following paragraphs we summarize the findings of fact entered by the trial court, amplified to include certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.