People v. Vasquez CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2014C074588California1,493 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/5/14 P. v. Vasquez CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C074588

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 12F04054 & 12F04621)

HUMBERTO MAGDELENO VASQUEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Humberto Magdeleno Vasquez asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Our review of the record discloses that the amended abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the orally imposed sentence and reflect that all offenses were committed in 2012. Finding no other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.