People v. Rich CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2014C074247California655 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/6/14 P. v. Rich CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C074247

v. (Super. Ct. No. CM037596)

SHANE ALEXANDER RICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Shane Alexander Rich asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment.

1 I Joseph Cesario, Michael Martin, Ryan Lorenc, Matthew Sarro and Michael Riehl were roommates in October 2012. At one point on October 26, Cesario, Martin, Sarro and Riehl were out of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.