Sabrina Laguna v. Coverall North America, Inc.

Good Law
762 F.3d 902·2014 WL 3891320·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15327
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 201412-55479California301 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

One or more members of this court has interest in calling for stia sponte en banc review of the three-judge panel opinion in this case, filed on June 3, 2014. Plaintiffs-Appellees and Defendants-Appellees are each ordered to file a response to the Petition for Rehearing En Banc that was filed and subsequently withdrawn by Objector-Appellant Singh. The responses should set forth their positions on whether the case should be reheard en banc, and include whether the settlement agreement makes this case moot and whether the prior panel opinion should be vacated. The responses of the parties shall be filed within 21 days of the filing of this order. Fifty copies should be filed. After both such responses are received by the court, any member of this court will have 7 days in which to make a sua sponte en banc call.

Any person or entity wishing to file a brief as an amicus curiae in response to this order is granted leave to do so pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 29(a).

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Defendants-Appel-lees, and Objector-Appellant are further ordered to file with this court a copy of the settlement agreement referenced in Objector-Appellant’s Notice of Withdrawal of Petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.