People v. Armstrong CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 11, 2014C064420California18,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/11/14 P. v. Armstrong CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C064420

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 07F07665)

v.

NORWOOD ARMSTRONG,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Norwood Armstrong appeals following conviction of forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (c)(2)1 (Counts One and Two)), forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2)(Count Three), second degree robbery (§ 211 (Count Four)), and kidnapping to commit sex offenses (§ 209 (Count Five)), with true findings on allegations that he personally used a firearm on all counts (§§ 12022.53, subd. (b)), and as to Counts One through Three, that he kidnapped the victim to commit a sex offense (§ 667.8),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.