Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company
Opinion
Opinion
360 F.2d 402 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellants, v. Van HARRIS, an individual, doing business as Harris & Sons, Appellee. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellants, v. PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., and Van Harris, an individual doing business as Harris & Sons, Appellees. PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., Appellant, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellees. Nos. 20121, 20122. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. March 29, 1966. 1 James W. Baldwin, Robert K. Worrell, Andrew J. Nocas, of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. 2 Van Harris, in pro. per. 3 Richard H. Floum, of Greenberg & Glusker, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee. 4 Before CHAMBERS and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District judge. 5 THOMPSON, District Judge. 6 The United States, acting through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on December 22, 1961, entered into a written contract with California Institute of Technology (CIT) under which CIT agreed to operate the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Pasadena, California, and to furnish…