Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company

Good Law
360 F.2d 402·1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6707
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 196620122California5,528 words

Opinion

Opinion

360 F.2d 402 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellants, v. Van HARRIS, an individual, doing business as Harris & Sons, Appellee. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellants, v. PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., and Van Harris, an individual doing business as Harris & Sons, Appellees. PARAMOUNT TRUCK RENTAL, INC., Appellant, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND and L. E. Dixon Company, Appellees. Nos. 20121, 20122. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. March 29, 1966. 1 James W. Baldwin, Robert K. Worrell, Andrew J. Nocas, of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants. 2 Van Harris, in pro. per. 3 Richard H. Floum, of Greenberg & Glusker, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee. 4 Before CHAMBERS and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District judge. 5 THOMPSON, District Judge. 6 The United States, acting through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on December 22, 1961, entered into a written contract with California Institute of Technology (CIT) under which CIT agreed to operate the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Pasadena, California, and to furnish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.