Cochran

Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, Inc.

Good Law
176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 407·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 724·228 Cal. App. 4th 1137·2014 WL 3965240·23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 204
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2014B247160California2,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

We hold that when employees must use their personal cell phones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 requires the employer to reimburse them. Whether the employees have cell phone plans with unlimited minutes or limited minutes, the reimbursement owed is a reasonable percentage of their cell phone bills. Because the trial court relied on erroneous legal assumptions about the application of section 2802, we must reverse the order denying certification to a class of 1,500 service managers in an action against Schwan’s Home Service, Inc. (Home Service), seeking, inter alia, reimbursement of work-related cell phone expenses. Upon remand, the trial court shall reconsider the motion for class certification in light of our interpretation of section 2802. When reconsidering the motion, it shall apply the principles set forth in Duran v. U.S. Bank National Assn. (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1 [ 172 Cal.Rptr.3d 371 , 325 P.3d 916 ] (Duran) to the degree that the class representative, Colin Cochran (Cochran), proposes to use statistical sampling evidence to establish either liability or damages. The parties shall have the opportunity to revise their papers to address the issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.