People v. Ross CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2014B255548California414 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/14 P. v. Ross CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B255548

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA028210) v.

ARTHUR JAMES ROSS, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daviann L. Mitchell, Judge. Dismissed. Jill Ishida, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendant, Arthur J. Ross, purports to appeal from an order denying his motion to recall his sentence. The gravamen of defendant’s papers filed in the trial court resemble a habeas corpus petition and a motion to vacate the judgment. We recognized the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.