In re Greenshields

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2014B252222MCalifornia3,446 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/14 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

2d Civil No. B252222 In re SEAN ALEN GREENSHIELDS, (Super. Ct. No. F198931) (San Luis Obispo County) on Habeas Corpus.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 14, 2014, be modified as follows: On page 9, add the following sentence to the end of the second full paragraph, after the sentence ending "to refuse treatment or dangerous within the meaning of section 5300": Because Greenshields is in the same position as an MDO or SVP, the trial court should consider whether he has committed the types of violent or threatening acts specified in section 5300 within the year prior to his most recent recommitment hearing. There is no change in the judgment. Filed 7/14/14 (unmodified version)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

2d Civil No. B252222 In re SEAN ALEN GREENSHIELDS, (Super. Ct. No. F198931) (San Luis Obispo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.