People v. Nava CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2014F065082California9,750 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/14 P. v. Nava CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F065082

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11CM2478) v.

JOSE AMEZCUA NAVA, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

F068148

In re

JOSE AMEZCUA NAVA,

On Habeas Corpus.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Donna Tarter, Judge. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Robert J. Beles and Manisha Daryani for Defendant and Appellant and for Petitioner. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Catherine Chatman and Daniel B. Bernstein, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent and for Respondent. -ooOoo- A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.