In re E.M. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2014F068527California3,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/13/14 In re E.M. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re E.M. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

RANDALL M.,

F068527

Petitioner and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13A0028) v.

OPINION

JOSE M.,

Objector and Appellant.

THE COURT1

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County. James T. LaPorte, Judge. Marsha F. Levine, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant. Randall M., in pro. per., for Petitioner and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

Before Hill, P. J., Gomes, J., and Chittick, J.† † Judge of the Fresno Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

Jose M. (father)2 appeals from a judgment granting a petition, under Family Code, section 78223,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.