United States v. John Apel
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 201411-50003California211 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50003 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00830-
JFW-
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50004 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00869-
JFW-
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50005 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00831-
JFW-
JOHN DENNIS APEL,
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed August 14, 2014
Before: Barry G. Silverman and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.*
Per Curiam Opinion
COUNSEL
Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California, Irvine School of Law, for Defendant-Appellant.
André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.