Sin Tjhin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 201410-72337California303 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AUG 14 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
SIN MUI TJHIN, No. 10-72337
Petitioner, Agency No. A097-369-290
v.
ORDER
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Before: WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and DAWSON, District Judge.*
The memorandum disposition filed June 5, 2014, is amended as follows.
After the first full paragraph on page 2, insert the following new paragraph:
Because the BIA’s decision rested on its conclusion that the harm suffered by Tjhin did not rise to the level of persecution, there was no need for the BIA to address her argument regarding the nexus of her harm to a protected ground. See Baghdasaryan v. Holder, 592 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An applicant alleging past persecution has the burden of establishing that (1) [her] treatment rises to the level of persecution, (2) the persecution was on account of one or more protected grounds; and (3) the persecution was committed by the government, or by forces that the government…