San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San Francisco

Good Law
176 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 838·229 Cal. App. 4th 498
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2014A137753California13,885 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellants San Francisco Tomorrow and Parkmerced Action Coalition (PMAC) appeal the San Francisco Superior Court’s denial of appellants’ petition for writ of mandate seeking to overturn the decision by respondents City and County of San Francisco (City) and its board of supervisors (Board) approving the Parkmerced Development Project (the project). The project involves the long-term redevelopment of the privately owned, 152-acre Parkmerced property by real party in interest Parkmerced Investors Properties, LLC.

Appellants challenge the court’s denial of their writ petition contending: (1) The “Land Use Element” (sometimes called the “Urban Design Element”) of the San Francisco General Plan (General Plan) is inadequate for failing to include standards for population density and building intensity. (Gov. Code, § 65302, subds. (a), (b).) (2) The project and the various project approvals are inconsistent with the “priority policies” and other policies of the General Plan. (3) The environmental impact report (EIR) and the findings underlying the City’s approval of the project were inadequate under standards established by the California Environmental Quality Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.