Rickley

Rickley v. Jamison CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2014B250972California3,354 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/14/14 Rickley v. Jamison CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

REBECCA A. RICKLEY, B250972

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC116576) v.

MARK B. JAMISON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Daniel J. Buckley, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Natasha Roit and Natasha Roit for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of David J. Weiss, David Weiss, Daron Barsamian; Pollack,

Vida & Fisher and Daniel P. Barer for Respondent.

_______________________________________ Rebecca A. Rickley appeals an order denying her motion to disqualify defense

counsel and expert witnesses in a dental malpractice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.