People v. Norman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 2014C074596California1,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/18/14 P. v. Norman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C074596

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F06964)

v.

JAMES NORMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant James Norman guilty of assault with a deadly weapon (a machete) and the jury found true a great bodily injury enhancement. He appeals, arguing the People presented insufficient evidence of the great bodily injury enhancement and the trial court abused its discretion in imposing the upper term of four years for the assault. We disagree and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In October 2012, defendant had been sleeping in the backyard of Mary Pinon’s house for approximately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.