Esaun Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
584 F. App'x 554
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 201411-72222California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Esaun Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence determinations regarding good moral character. Urzua Covarrubias v. Gonzales, 487 F.3d 742, 747 (9th Cir.2007). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Torres is statutorily barred from establishing the good moral character necessary to qualify for cancellation of removal because he knowingly gave false testimony under oath at his asylum interview in 2007 with the subjective intent to obtain an immigration benefit. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 (f)(6), 1229b(b)(l)(B); Ramos v. INS, 246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th Cir.2001) (concluding that a petitioner who had made false statements under oath during an asylum interview had given false testimony for the purpose of obtaining immigration benefits and could therefore not establish good moral character, even though she had later withdrawn her asylum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.