Windfield

People v. Windfield

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2014E055062California13,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Johnson and Windfield were members of the Ramona Blocc Hustla gang. Johnson

and Windfield were close friends. Johnson was easily influenced by Windfield and

Johnson’s gang moniker was Little Bam, while Windfield’s was Bam.

Months before June 11, 2009, the murder victim’s close friend, MM, had taken the

murder victim to a Ramona Blocc party at a place in Rialto where people buy and use

drugs and hang out, when members of that gang who were cousins of MM beat up and

threatened the murder victim with guns and Windfield sucker punched him.

On June 11, 2009, the murder victim was with MM and the attempted murder

victim in the same vicinity, which was near an apartment where three females were

3 spending time together. The attempted murder victim had a “friends with benefits”

relationship with Windfield’s sister at the time. The murder victim was under the

influence and he expressed anger at MM for not intervening on his behalf during the prior

dust up between him, MM’s cousins and Windfield at the party in Rialto. He was also

still angry at MM’s cousins and Windfield, and he said he wanted to “go over . . . and

shoot up Ramona” and “kill those dudes.” MM told the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.