P.

P. v. Eusted CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2014C074347California3,640 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/19/14 P. v Eusted CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C074347

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F06187)

v.

ROSEMARY EUSTED,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Rosemary Eusted was found guilty by a jury of 17 counts of forcible lewd acts on a child under 14 years of age (Pen. Code,1 § 288, subd. (b)(1)) committed against M. H., her daughter, and K. H., her niece. The jury also found that the offenses were committed against more than one victim, thereby bringing defendant within the

Further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.

1 more severe sentencing provisions provided by section 667, subdivision (e)(4), the “one strike…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.