Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. Partners

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2014A135226California4,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/19/14 Applied Biosystems v. 384 Foster City Blvd. Partners

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC,

Cross-complainant and Appellant,

A135226

v. 384 FOSTER CITY BOULEVARD (San Mateo County PARTNERS, Super. Ct. No. CIV 496994) Cross-defendant and Respondent.

A landlord, 384 Foster City Boulevard Partners (FCB Partners), sued its former tenant, Applied Biosystems, LLC (Applied Biosystems), for lost rent damages it incurred due to the inability to lease the premises after Applied Biosystems failed to repair and restore the leased premises at the conclusion of the lease. In a cross-complaint, Applied Biosystems sought to rescind an agreement in which FCB…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.