United States v. Marshall Richmond

Good Law
584 F. App'x 589
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 201413-30341California141 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Marshall Charles Richmond appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Richmond’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Richmond has filed two pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.