McLean

McLean v. State of California

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2014C074515California4,947 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

The Complaint The operative pleading is the first amended complaint (FAC). It alleges that McLean worked for the State of California until she retired from the Attorney General’s office on November 16, 2010. She separated from service the same day she retired. She did not receive her final wages on her last day of employment or within 72 hours of that date. The correct amount of her wages for unused leave and vacation time were not transferred into her supplemental retirement plan within 45 days of the last day of her employment, as she requested. She did not receive wages that she had elected to defer to 2011 by February 1, 2011. The FAC alleged, on information and belief, that defendants failed to make prompt payments required by section 202 to the Plaintiff Class. The Plaintiff Class was defined as all employees employed by the state who resigned or retired from their

Further undesignated statutory references are to the Labor Code.

2 employment November 2010 through March 2011, who did not receive prompt payment of wages as required by section 202.2 The FAC alleged that on June 14, 2011, McLean filed a claim with the California Victim Compensation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.