Velazquez

DISCUSSION

Appellant raises three contentions on appeal. However, appellant has failed to provide a record sufficient to review his contentions. “‘[Appellant] has the burden of providing an adequate record. [Citation.] Failure to provide an adequate record on an issue requires that the issue be resolved against [appellant].’ [Citation.]” (Foust v. San Jose Construction Co., Inc. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 181, 187 (Foust).) We therefore affirm. Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in granting respondent relief in the form of right to possession or “in lieu rent” in the judgment because these issues were not raised by the parties. Appellant has failed to provide a copy of the judgment in the appellate record.1 California Rules of Court, rule 8.124(b)(1)(A) requires an appellant’s appendix to contain “[a]ll items required by rule 8.122(b)(1), showing the dates

1 Despite appellant’s assertion in his reply brief that the judgment is attached as an exhibit to the Notice of Judgment, there is no such exhibit. The Notice of Judgment, found at Tab 26, begins at page 164 of the appendix and skips to page 169. Page 167, which appellant contends is the judgment, is not in…